Friday, October 10, 2008

Does anyone have any information on judges outside of Maricopa County?

We've been getting numerous requests for information on judges outside of Maricopa County. If you have any knowledge of their political views/rulings, please email us at azjudgesreview-at-gmail.com.
Posted by at

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would like info on Sheldon Weisberg, who is Judge of the Court of Appeals Division 1, who is up for reelection.

October 13, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Anonymous said...

please! we are hungry for more information like this! we want to know about other arizona judges up for retainment. please help.

October 19, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Kathleen Langdon said...

Presiding Judge Wm O'Neil This judge is totally contemptous of his oath, ignoring and despising the constitutions of the US and AZ, and whether ignorant of their contents or considering himself above the law, he consistently refuses to apply constitutional law or statuory law, as well as legal precedent and simple reason, unless it meshes with his personal agenda and prejudices. He provides special treatment to preferred attorneys, excusing any abuse while holding their opponents guilty of contrived violations. He will sanction an unrepresented litigant but never, under any circumstances, sanction a truly abusive attorney who has his favor. He drags with him a bullpen of arrogant, self-serving judges who act like clones of his unconscionable mind. All for one and one for all, they never conflict with each other in orders or decisions, yet manage to conflict with statute, case law, precedent, moral integrity and simple reason so consistently you cringe at their very names. They are enabled to act so treacherously because they are unilaterally supported by the Appeals Court, that also seems not to care about the Constitutions and enacted statutes, and all in harmony together, they mock the founding fathers and bring injustice to a new low in depravity with total impunity. Apparently the only way to impede this direction is to publish their names and abuses across the net in big red letters, and cry injustice until the media is forced to make it public. Like the names of 'johns' published in the local paper, these prostituted judges' names need to become the citizens' campaign to bring it to an end. The devastation these judges cause AZ citizens is legendary, even going to the human rights councils of other countries and getting support. Such shameful acts bring the whole of AZ into disrespect. Who will act? For verification, examine the Superior Case and Appeal Case Langdon vs. Arnold, now ten years and four appeals in total. Last case no. 2 CA-CV 2008-0152

August 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Kathleen Langdon said...

Appeals Court judges Div II: Denied four cut-and-dried appeals, declined jurisdiction on special action after filing of brief, response,& reply. Denied appeal when matter was proven beyond any doubt and completely uncontroverted. Denied rehearing although numerous specific, documented, and evidenced errors were proven, such critical errors as to deny justice completely. Due process denied again and again, against statutes no jurist can deny or ignore lawfully. Entered a void order so blatantly unlawful as to have no validity whatever. Noticed by appellant that order was void. This order was entered by Eckerstrom, concurred by Brammer and Howard. Case No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0152 If the superior court is openly prejudiced, rampant with conflict of interest, defies th e law, and denies due process over and over with impunity, and the appeals court affirms every abuse, and the supreme court is too busy, what manner of remedy is left? How do you stop these people who certainly won't hesitate to do the same thing over and over to all who don't fit their prejudices or when it suits their agendas.

August 19, 2009 at 4:07 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)